Search for: All records

Abstract Local empirical models of the F2 layer peak electron density (NmF2) are developed for 43 low‐ middle latitude ionosonde stations using auto‐scaled data from Lowell GIRO data center and manually scaled data from World Data Center for Ionosphere and Space Weather. Data coverage at these stations ranges from a few years to up to 6 decades. Flare Irradiance Spectral Model index version 2 (FISM2) and ap3 index are used to parametrize the solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux and geomagnetic activity dependence of NmF2. Learning curves suggest that approximately 8 years of data coverage is required to constrain the solar activity dependence of NmF2. Output of local models altogether captures well known anomalies of the F2 ionospheric layer. Performance metrics demonstrate that the model parametrized using FISM2 has better accuracy than a similarly parametrized model with F10.7, as well as than the IRI‐2020 model. Skill score metrics indicate that the FISM2 based model outperforms F10.7 model at all solar activity levels. The improved accuracy of model with FISM2 over F10.7 is due to better representation of solar rotation by FISM2, and due to its performance at solar extremum. Application of singular spectrum analysis to model output reveals that solar rotation contributes to about 2%–3% of the variance in NmF2 data and FISM2 based model, while F10.7 based models overestimate the strength of solar rotation to be at 4%–7%. At solar extremum, both F10.7‐based model and IRI‐2020 tend to overestimate the NmF2 while FISM2 provides the most accurate prediction out of three. 

Abstract Sporadic‐E (Es) are thin layers of enhanced ionization observed in the E‐region, typically between 95 and 120 km altitude. Es plays an important role in controlling the dynamics of the upper atmosphere and it is necessary to understand the geophysical factors influencing Es from both the scientific and operational perspectives. While the wind‐shear theory is widely accepted as an important mechanism responsible for the generation of Es, there are still gaps in the current state of our knowledge. For example, we are yet to determine precisely how changes in the dynamics of horizontal winds impact the formation, altitude, and destruction of Es layers. In this study, we report results from a coordinated experimental campaign between the Millstone Hill Incoherent Scatter Radar, the SuperDARN radar at Blackstone, and the Millstone Hill Digisonde to monitor the dynamics of mid‐latitude Es layers. We report observations during a 15‐hr window between 13 UT on 3 June 2022 and 4 UT on 4 June 2022, which was marked by the presence of a strong Es layer. We find that the height of the Es layer is collocated with strong vertical shears in atmospheric tides and that the zonal wind shears play a more important role than meridional wind shears in generating Es, especially at lower altitudes. Finally, we show that in the presence of Es, SuperDARN ground backscatter moves to closer ranges, and the height and critical frequency of the Es layer have a significant impact on the location and intensity of HF ground scatter.